Plus, at least for the ones I've dealt with, the partner exclusively interacts with the customer, so bad support gets labelled as having a bad partner, not as Microsoft being bad.
#Airtable api php plus
in an ultra valuable bundle, but all small businesses see is Exchange plus a bunch of other bloat they're never going to use but are forced to pay for. Microsoft thinks they're selling all this awesome stuff like Exchange, OneDrive, Teams, etc. Most small businesses I deal with would be way better off with Exchange than with their current shared hosting email providers, but the value just isn't there for a lot of them. Most small businesses owners are practical and will pay for things when they need them, but they're fairly price sensitive and they expect good value for their money. I deal with a lot of small businesses and to me it feels like that entire sector of the industry is being abandoned. That isn't bitterness or anything (I've always dealt with B2B software) but it's the reality of the thing as I can see. They think they want no-support but they don't, and they will retroactively rebrand their reasons to be more than money. When you try to do that, you will get an army of users who want to not pay but who do want support. The problem is the users who occupy the no-support space cannot be selected as consumers. But even though Google has Google One in the US if you want paid response, this forum frequently decries the lack of support. In their case, they got brand awareness quite fast. Google, for instance, offers one of these for their email product and are able to make the product free. But that's the reason I wouldn't want to do it.īesides, there's no way you can only access the no-support users. You'll get stuck in a local minimum of being a small-time consulting company. Plus places incentives on your org to force things to be incidents since that's what pays. Significantly damages your brand to do this and you'll defacto turn into a consulting company. This is all /barely/ worth it because Google Docs doesn't work when you need a large structured database with many collaborators. Booleans in the API are `true` or `undefined`. Documentation for which fields is entirely in scattered forum posts from users. except you can _sometimes_ by adding a parameter which is documented to try to convert dates, but actually modifies field definitions for a number of fields. You can't modify a table configuration by API.
(The auto-generated API documentation is actually wrong if you don't have a fully-filled-in row somewhere in the first few rows.) The API has no way to query the structure of a table, you have to infer it from the first few records. Simple and obvious bugs in the official API clients have not been fixed for years (for example, Promises in the official JS library throw the string `` for all exceptions.) Their status page was actually down for a while (I think they forgot to renew it?) There are months where it's literally 1 nine of uptime. Reliable 1-5 hours a month of downtime. Here are just a FEW of the "features" Airtable charges $24/user/mo for:
I have used Airtable extensively, and it's a pile of garbage. Click the Test button to confirm the connection is functioning.I am so excited for this software.
Once the values above are populated, click the Test button and enter the name of the table being connected to in the "Test table name" dialog that appears. Copy and paste this ID into your EasyMorph connection configuration. Provided in the "Introduction" section at the top. You will be taken to a page customized for the selected base. Page, select the base you wish to connect to. This is found by selecting Help from your account's Dashboard screen, and selecting " API Documentation". (Note: Clicking the Regenerate API key will create a new Key for your account and will disable Copy and paste it into the " API Key" field in your EasyMorphĬonnection configuration. (your API Key is hidden by default) to reveal your Key. This is found by accessing your Airtable account page and scrolling down to the " API" section.
0 kommentar(er)
